The letter arrived on a Tuesday in October 2025, tucked between a utilities bill and a grocery store circular. Kevin Womack set his UPS cap on the kitchen counter, read the notice twice, and then walked outside to sit on the front steps of the Northeast Portland duplex he and his wife, Denise, had rented for six years. The landlord was raising their monthly rent from $1,870 to $2,430 — a 30 percent jump, effective at lease renewal in January.
Kevin reached out to Benefit Reporter a few weeks after that moment, having come across a piece I wrote last spring about a Seattle couple navigating a similar housing shock after retirement. He sent a short email: “Your story could have been ours. We’re living it right now.” I called him back the same afternoon.
A Solid Life That Suddenly Felt Fragile
When I sat down with Kevin Womack — over video call, him still in his brown uniform on a lunch break — he didn’t present himself as someone in crisis. He was measured, even wry. But the numbers he walked me through told a different story than his composed delivery.
At 56, Kevin earns roughly $74,500 a year as a full-time UPS package car driver, a job he has held since 2007. His wife Denise, 54, had worked as a licensed vocational nurse for 22 years before retiring in August 2025 due to a degenerative knee condition. Her retirement income — a modest pension plus early Social Security — amounts to approximately $1,640 a month. The couple’s combined monthly take-home, after taxes and Kevin’s union dues, sits at around $5,900.
Before the rent hike, they managed. After it, the math stopped working.
Kevin went back to school in his early forties to earn a master’s degree in organizational leadership — a decision he made hoping to move into a management role. The promotion never materialized. He returned to driving and has been paying off approximately $41,200 in federal student loan debt for over a decade, currently at $560 a month on a graduated repayment plan.
The Compounding Problem Nobody Talked About
What made Kevin’s situation harder to untangle was that none of his problems were new — they had simply collided at the worst possible moment. The rent increase alone would have been manageable in a different year. The student loans alone were a burden he had learned to absorb. But with Denise’s income cut by more than half after her retirement, the timing of the rent hike was devastating.
There was also a third thread Kevin mentioned almost in passing: Denise has a daughter from a previous relationship, now 19, and her ex-husband — the girl’s father — had been inconsistent with child support payments for years. While the daughter is now an adult and no longer eligible for support, the years of missed and partial payments had left gaps in the family’s finances that Kevin described as “holes we just kept patching.”
Kevin told me he spent hours researching Oregon’s tenant protections after receiving the notice. The exemption for newer construction — a detail buried in the state’s rent stabilization statute — meant his landlord had acted entirely within the law. “I felt like I did everything right,” he said. “Good job, union benefits, never missed rent. And it didn’t matter.”
Looking for Footholds: Programs, Side Hustles, and Hard Conversations
Kevin described himself as someone who is constitutionally incapable of sitting still when a problem presents itself. Within two weeks of the rent notice, he had launched a weekend handyman side business through a local Nextdoor group, taken on two overtime shifts per week at UPS, and started researching every assistance program he could find for middle-income households facing housing cost burdens.
The student loan pivot was the most concrete win. Kevin had been aware of income-driven repayment plans in a vague, “I’ll look into that someday” way, but the rent crisis forced him to act. By recertifying his household income — now lower with Denise’s reduced retirement income factored in — and switching to IBR, he brought his monthly loan payment down by $248. According to Federal Student Aid’s income-driven repayment overview, IBR caps payments at a percentage of discretionary income, which varies based on when loans were first disbursed.
It was not a solution to the rent problem. But it was oxygen.
What Middle-Income Families Fall Through
One of the more frustrating parts of Kevin’s story — and one he brought up without prompting — is how little the public assistance landscape is designed for households like his. “Everyone told me I make too much,” he said. “I make too much for rental help. Too much for food assistance. But nobody told me how to make the math work when rent goes up $560 and you’re already stretched.”
He is not wrong that the gap exists. Most federal rental assistance programs — including Emergency Rental Assistance funds administered by states — prioritize households earning 80 percent or less of Area Median Income (AMI), with the lowest-income households often given first priority. In the Portland metro area, 80 percent AMI for a two-person household is approximately $73,750. Kevin’s gross household income, even with Denise’s reduced retirement earnings, edges above that line.
Kevin spent several evenings navigating Benefits.gov and Oregon’s 211 information line, looking for programs he might have missed. The handyman work — which he’d started mostly out of restlessness — turned out to be the most reliable lever he had. By February 2026, he was averaging between $600 and $800 per month in side income from weekend jobs: hanging doors, patching drywall, assembling furniture for a few regular clients he found through word of mouth.
Where Things Stand Now — and What Remains Unresolved
When I spoke with Kevin again in late March 2026, he was cautiously stable — his word, not mine. The IBR switch had freed up $248 a month. The handyman work was adding a few hundred more. He and Denise were actively searching for a less expensive rental in outer Northeast or the Lents neighborhood, hoping to find something closer to $1,950 a month, which would restore some of the cushion they’d lost.
But stability is not the same as security, and Kevin was clear-eyed about the difference. He still carries over $41,000 in student loan debt on a federal system that has seen significant policy turbulence — the SAVE repayment plan he had initially hoped to use was tied up in federal court litigation at the time of our conversation. His IBR enrollment is stable for now, but recertification is required annually, and Denise’s income situation could shift.
There is a version of Kevin’s story that ends tidily — man adapts, survives, moves on. But what I kept returning to after our conversations was something less tidy: he did almost everything right, and the floor still dropped. Good job. Union. Decades of on-time rent. A graduate degree he paid for with the expectation it would open doors. None of it made him immune to a landlord’s legal right to raise rent, or to the particular cruelty of a system that considers $74,000 a year too comfortable for meaningful help.
The side hustle income helps. The IBR switch helped. But Kevin told me he worries most about what happens if he gets injured on the job, if Denise’s health costs rise, if the handyman work dries up in a wet Portland winter. “There’s no cushion for any of that,” he said. “That’s what people don’t see when they look at a guy who drives a UPS truck and think, he’s fine.”
He might be fine. He is working very hard at fine. But fine, for Kevin Womack, right now, requires two jobs, careful paperwork, and the kind of vigilance that doesn’t leave much room for a Tuesday evening on the front steps.
Related: After His Wife Retired, Oscar Kirby’s Drug Costs Jumped $340 a Month — Here’s What Happened
Leave a Reply